Illustrative photo for: Dutch MEP compares Muslim Brotherhood to 20th-century

Published 2026-05-24

Related image for: Dutch MEP compares Muslim Brotherhood to 20th-century

Summary: A Dutch MEP suggested that the Muslim Brotherhood bears similarities to 20th-century Marxist movements that sought to infiltrate states. The broader political conversation in the Netherlands centers on moves to ban the Muslim Brotherhood and related organizations, with parliamentary action having been taken after shifting positions by some coalition partners.

What We Know

  • The Dutch parliament approved a PVV motion to ban the Muslim Brotherhood and related organizations, after prior attempts failed and after ChristenUnie and 50PLUS reversed their stance.
  • The move to ban has drawn international attention, reflecting concerns about the Brotherhood as a transnational organization.
  • A Dutch MEP has publicly compared the Muslim Brotherhood, in some respects, to Marxist organizations of the 20th century that tried to infiltrate states.
  • There is an explicit rationale cited by some governments for listing the Brotherhood as a terror organization in certain states such as Egypt and Jordan.

What’s Still Unclear

  • Whether the specific comparison by a Dutch MEP to 20th-century Marxist infiltration is widely echoed or attributed to a particular official is not clearly evidenced in the available excerpts.
  • The current legal status of the ban at the time of reporting (whether the motion’s passage translates into an immediate ban or requires further steps) is not explicitly confirmed in the provided material.
  • Exact details on the content and scope of the “related organizations” included in the motion are not described here.

Context

General background: In several democracies, concerns about transnational political movements lead to debates over banning organizations perceived as threats to national security or democratic values. The issue often involves balancing security considerations with civil liberties, and may involve international reactions when actions are perceived as taking a stance against a global organization.

Why It Matters

The discussion touches on how governments respond to transnational political groups and the tools they use (such as banning) to address perceived threats. It also highlights how internal party dynamics and coalition shifts can influence security policy decisions in the EU context.

What to Watch Next

  • Follow-up parliamentary steps to implement the ban and monitor any legal challenges or procedural hurdles.
  • Track international reactions or statements from allied governments regarding the Dutch move.
  • Look for additional statements from Dutch lawmakers or EU institutions clarifying the scope of the ban and the criteria used.

FAQ

Q: What is the current status of the ban on the Muslim Brotherhood in the Netherlands?
A: Not confirmed in the available information; reports indicate a parliamentary motion passed, but further implementation details are not provided here.

Q: Did the Dutch MEP explicitly equate the Muslim Brotherhood with 20th-century Marxist groups?
A: A Dutch MEP reportedly made a comparison in some respects; exact phrasing and attribution are not clearly evidenced in the provided excerpts.

Related coverage

Source Transparency

  • This article is based on a short preliminary brief and may not reflect the full details available in ongoing reporting.
  • Source links are provided in the Sources section where available.
  • A limited open-web check was used to clarify key details when possible; unclear items remain clearly marked.

Original brief: The Dutch Member of the European Parliament
@sandersmitwzn
says that the Muslim Brotherhood is in some ways similar to the Marxist organizations that tried to infiltrate states in the 20th century

He says there’s a reason why states such as Egypt & Jordan have terror-listed them…

Sources


Leave a Reply

Discover more from CEAN

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading